| ** | Latin American Journal of Clinical Sciences and Medical Technology is an open access magazine. To read all published articles and materials you just need to register Registration is free of charge. Register now If you already have registered please Log In | ** |
Introduction. The global incidence of scorpion sting is estimated at 1.5 million events. In 2010, Guanajuato reported an increase in the incidence of poisoning by scorpion sting of 28,973 cases and 43,913 cases in 2019. In Mexico, antidotes Alacramyn® and Birmex® are used to treat scorpion stings and have been evaluated in terms of costs, which have been $ 500.00 to $ 600.00. This document aimed to estimate the cost minimization in the use of Alacramyn® vs. Birmex® in poisonings by scorpion sting. Material and Methods. Data from Cruz Roja Mexicana, Delegación León, were analyzed from January 1st, 2016 to December 30th, 2019 according to the use of Alacramyn® (n= 5,390) and Birmex® (n = 4,039). Results. For the Birmex® group, a total of 13,356 vials were used at a cost of $ 2,430,925.56; for Alacramyn® a total of 10,170 vials, the cost being $ 1,834,842.81 (p = 0.001). Discussion. The clinical practice guidelines describe the number of vials to be administered concerning the degree of poisoning by scorpion sting; however, the use of Birmex® and Alacramyn® is different from the number of vials administered, which is not mentioned or described in the clinical practice guidelines. Conclusions. According to the data obtained in the present document, the cost per scorpion sting with the use of Alacramyn® was lower, which has a direct economic impact on the hospitals that provide such care.
Introducción. La incidencia global por picadura de alacrán se estima en cerca de 1.5 millones de eventos. En 2010, Guanajuato reportó un aumento de la incidencia de intoxicaciones por picadura de alacrán que alcanzó 28,973 casos y 43,913 casos en 2019. En México se emplean dos antídotos (Alacramyn® y Birmex®) para tratar picaduras de alacrán, los cuales han sido evaluados en términos de costos, mismos que han sido de $500.00 a $600.00. El objetivo de este documento fue estimar la minimización de costo con el uso de Alacramyn®vs. Birmex® en intoxicaciones por picadura de alacrán, Material y métodos. Se analizaron datos de la Cruz Roja Mexicana, Delegación León del 1 de enero de 2016 al 30 de diciembre de 2019 de acuerdo con el uso de Alacramyn® (n= 5,390) y Birmex® (n= 4,039). Resultados. Para el grupo de Birmex® se utilizó un total de 13,356 viales, cuyo costo fue de $2,430,925.56; para Alacramyn® se aplicó un total de 10,170 viales, cuyo costo fue de $1,834,842.81 (p=0.001). Discusión. La guía de práctica clínica describe el número de viales a administrar en relación con el grado de intoxicación por picadura de alacrán; sin embargo, el uso de Birmex® y Alacramyn® es diferente respecto al número de viales administrado, lo cual no se menciona o describe en la guía de práctica clínica. Conclusiones. El costo por picadura de alacrán con el uso Alacramyn® fue menor según los datos obtenidos en el presente trabajo; ello tiene un impacto económico directo en los hospitales que brindan dicha atención.
The term scorpion is derived from the Latin word scorpio, which in turn comes from the Greek skorpios. Alacrán is the Spanish word from Arabic al`aqráb. In Nahuatl language, the term is colotl, which means monster.1
Scorpion stings constitute a medical emergency because of the inoculation of toxins in the tissue, which causes a varied toxic syndrome. They affect several organs and systems, produce sympathetic and parasympathetic stimulation, and can lead to the patient´s death.2
Epidemiology
Scorpion sting global incidence is estimated at 1.5 million events with 2,600 fatal cases.3 Out of the 281 species in Mexico, only 12 of the genus Centruroides are of medical relevance. C. noxius in Nayarit, C. limpidus in Guerrero, Morelos, and Michoacán, C. infamatus in Guanajuato and Estado de México, C. elegans in Jalisco, C. tecomanus in Colima, C. suffusus in Durango and C. sculpturatus in Sonora.4,5 Guanajuato has had an increase in the incidence of poisoning by scorpion sting since 2010 with 28,973 cases reported until 2019 with 43,913 cases.6-14
Sting accidents increase in hot weather and at night.2,15 There are two different brands of scorpion antidotes available in Mexico to treat them. One is produced by Laboratorios de Reactivos y Biológicos de México S.A. de C.V., Birmex® under the name of “faboterápico polivalente antialacrán" (anti-scorpion polyvalent fabotherapic); the other is manufactured by Bioclon Institute under the Alacramyn® brand. Both neutralize an LD50 (150 per vial) and are obtained from hyperimmunized horses serum and a venom mixture of C. noxius, C. limpidus, and C. suffusus.16-18
According to NOM-033-SSA2-2011, the following reference scheme is used for the surveillance, prevention, and control of scorpion sting poisoning, in poisonings in adults19:
Treatment should begin within the first 30 minutes after the bite.2 Antivenom application is more favorable against the scorpion sting than not doing it20, regardless of price.21
It has been reported the application of up to ten doses of Birmex®22, while with Alacramyn® is three maximum doses with an average hospital stay of 1 hour with mild symptoms and 3 with severe symptoms.20
Care Costs
Direct costs such as medical fees, medications, studies, rehabilitation services, transportation, and supplies acquisitions for treatment must be considered to calculate the care cost; as well as indirect costs, which are the monetary cost of lost work time and psychic costs, which the user invests in the process of seeking and monitoring medical care.23
In 1999, the average cost of the Alacramyn® antidote, infusion equipment, parenteral solutions, antihistamines, steroids, and medical fees was measured, ranging from $ 500.00 to $ 600.00 pesos.24
A study carried out in eight rural areas of Amatlán de las Cañas (Nayarit, Mexico) during 1995, evaluated two treatment schemes and the direct and indirect costs of the scorpion sting. Scheme A comprised public transportation, a day's salary, and meals for the patient; thus, the estimate was $ 148.50 pesos. Scheme B included taxi transfer, companion and patient working hours, companion and patient meals, at the cost of $ 395.50 pesos.25 The cost of using home remedies is not considered.26
In the 2016-2017 consolidated purchase, the antivenom cost was $ 210.12 pesos with a discount rate of 2.58% in Birmex®, and 0.54% for Alacramyn®. In 2017-2018, the cost was $ 212.48 pesos with a discount of 14.34% in Birmex® and 0.01% in Alacramyn®. Finally, in 2018-2019 the price was $ 182.01 pesos for both, offering a discount of 10.80% Birmex® and 3.30% on Alacramyn®.27-29 This study aimed to compare both products costs in patients with scorpion sting poisoning.
A retrospective, descriptive, cost-minimization study in patients poisoned by scorpion sting at Cruz Roja Mexicana, Delegación León, from January 1st, 2016 to December 30th, 2019. The general practitioners divided the digital files into Alacramyn® (n = 5,390) and Birmex® (n = 4,039) groups.
The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee from Cruz Roja Mexicana I.A.P. Delegación León, Guanajuato. The CHEERS (Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards) checklist was used.30
Price Estimation
The costs of the Goods Acquired in the Consolidated Purchase 2018-2019 of the IMSS were used. The antivenom vial cost was $ 182.01 pesos for Birmex® (with a discount rate of 10.80%) and $ 182.01 pesos for Alacramyn® (with a discount rate of 3.30%).27
Statistic Analysis
The normality of the variables was checked with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Nominal variables were presented in frequencies and percentages; quantitative variables were presented as means with their standard deviation. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for the analysis between groups. The student's t-test was performed for the comparison of means. A p <0.05 was considered significant, estimating 95% confidence intervals. The statistical program SPSS version 21 was used for data analysis.
In total, 9,459 users treated for scorpion sting poisoning were analyzed. For the Birmex® group (n = 4,039) 2,097 men (51.91%) and 1,942 women (48.08); mean age was 31.13 ± 18.10 (range: 1 year to 97 years). The Alacramyn® group (n = 5,390) with 2,874 men (53.32%) and 2,516 women (46.67%); mean age 31.99 ± 17.94 years (range: 1 year to 91 years). The other sociodemographic data are shown in Table 1.
| Table 1. Sociodemographic data, costs, and time of attention by age groups | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birmex® | Alacramyn® | p | Birmex® | Alacramyn® | p | Birmex® | Alacramyn® | p | Birmex® | Alacramyn® | p | Birmex® | Alacramyn® | p | ||
| <6 años | 7-18 años | 19-35 años | 36-60 años | >60 años | ||||||||||||
| Gender | Male, n (%) | 129 (55) | 152 (55) | NS | 480 (55) | 603 (56) | NS | 823 (54) | 1166 (57) | NS | 575 (51) | 808 (50) | NS | 128 (43) | 179 (42) | NS |
| Female, n (%) | 104 (45) | 124 (45) | NS | 394 (45) | 469 (44) | NS | 714 (46) | 882 (43) | NS | 550 (49) | 794 (50) | NS | 169 (57) | 244 (58) | NS | |
| Age, average ± SD | 3.62 ± 0.1 | 3.45 ± 0.11 | NS | 14 ± 0.11 | 14.07 ± 0.11 | NS | 26.03 ± 0.12 | 26.14 ± 0.12 | NS | 46.7 ± 0.2 | 46.23 ± 0.2 | NS | 70.51 ± 0.45 | 69.77 ± 0.41 | NS | |
| Dose, total | 1145 | 805 | 0.001 | 2770 | 1974 | 0.001 | 4936 | 3681 | 0.001 | 3549 | 2867 | 0.001 | 1020 | 798 | 0.001 | |
| Cost (pesos), total | 208401.45 | 146518.05 | 0.001 | 504167.7 | 359287.74 | 0.001 | 898401.36 | 669978.81 | 0.001 | 645953.49 | 521822.67 | 0.001 | 185650.2 | 145243.98 | 0.001 | |
| Time of sting to hospitalization (min), average ± SD (CI 95%) | 127.88 ± 4.3 (119.38-136.37) | 128.82 ± 4.25 (120.44-137.19) | NS | 125.6 ± 2.18 (121.31-129.88) | 127.73 ± 2.22 (123.37-132.08) | NS | 128.13 ± 1.64 (124.9-131.36) | 128.68 ± 1.64 (125.46-131.9) | NS | 127.35 ± 1.95 (123.5-131.19) | 126.33 ± 1.97 (122.47-130.2) | NS | 130.86 ± 3.79 (123.39-138.32) | 126.64 ± 3.77 (119.22-134-06) | NS | |
| Time of hospitalization (min), average ± SD (CI 95%) | 234.85 ± 4.43 (226.12-243.59) | 135.91 ± 3.4 (128.97-142.38) | 0.001 | 237.02 ± 2.36 (232.39-241.66) | 130.58 ± 1.73 (127.18-133.99) | 0.001 | 239.55 ± 1.77 (236.07-243.03) | 132.56 ± 1.31 (129.97-135.15) | 0.001 | 242.03 ± 2.09 (237.93-246.14) | 131.96 ± 1.52 (128.64-134.65) | 0.001 | 244.23 ± 4.11 (236.14-252.32) | 129.49 ± 2.9 (123.76-135.22) | 0.001 | |
| Intoxication grade | Grade 1, n (%) | 99 (43) | 83 (34.2) | NS | 526 (60) | 523 (49) | NS | 869 (57) | 975 (47.6) | NS | 627 (56) | 764 (48) | NS | 161 (54) | 189 (45) | NS |
| Grade 2, n (%) | 109 (47) | 147 (60.5) | 323 (37) | 512 (48) | 649 (42) | 1021 (49.9) | 483 (43) | 792 (49) | 129 (43) | 221 (52) | ||||||
| Grade 3, n (%) | 23 (10) | 13 (5.3) | 25 (3) | 37 (3) | 19 (1) | 52 (2.5) | 15 (1) | 46 (3) | 7 (2) | 13 (3) | ||||||
| SD: standard deviation; min: minutes; CI: confidence interval; NS: non-significant | ||||||||||||||||
Supplies
Based on the materials required, the direct cost per patient for applying Fragments F (ab) '2 of polyvalent anti-scorpion immunoglobulin is the following: alcoholated swabs (3 pieces) $ 1.11, physiological solution 100 ml (1 piece): $ 14.21, insyte (1 piece) : $ 4.1, venoclysis equipment (1 piece): $ 4.11, syringe 20 ml (1 piece): $ 2.17, mouthwash (1 piece): $ 0.2, emergency medical fees: $ 833.00.27 For a total cost of $ 858.92 pesos in direct costs derived from care.
Antivenom
For the Birmex® group, 13,356 vials were used at the cost of $ 2,430,925.56, whereas for Alacramyn®, a total of 10,170 vials and the cost was $ 1,834,842.81 (Student's t, p = 0.001). The use of vials and costs by age groups are shown in Table 2.
| Table 2. Sociodemographic data, costs, and time of attention by groups of treatment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birmex® | Alacramyn® | p | ||
| Gender | Male, n (%) | 2097 (51.91) | 2874 (53.32) | NS |
| Female, n (%) | 1942 (48.08) | 2516 (46.67) | NS | |
| Age, average ± SD | 70.51 ± 0.45 | 69.77 ± 0.41 | NS | |
| Dose, total | 13356 | 10081 | 0.001 | |
| Cost (pesos), total | 2430925.56 | 1834842.81 | 0.001 | |
| Time of sting to hospitalization (min), average ± SD (CI 95%) | 130.86 ± 3.79 (123.39-138.32) | 126.64 ± 3.77 (119.22-134.06) | NS | |
| Time of hospitalization (min), average ± SD (CI 95%) | 244.23 ± 4.11 (236.14-252.32) | 129.49 ± 2.9 (123.76-135.22) | 0.001 | |
| Intoxication grade | Grade 1, n (%) | 2262 (56) | 2513 (46.62) | NS |
| Grade 2, n (%) | 1685 (41.72) | 2683 (49.78) | ||
| Grade 3, n (%) | 91 (2.25) | 194 (3.6) | ||
| SD: standard deviation; min: minutes; CI: confidence interval; NS: non-significant | ||||
Time Elapsed from the Sting to Hospitalization
The mean sting at hospitalization for all subjects was 127.58 ± 64.97 min; for Birmex®, it was 127.62 ± 64.92 min; for the Alacramyn® group, it was 127.60 ± 64.98 min. A comparison analysis of means (Student T) between both groups did not show a significant difference (p = 0.942).
Intoxication Grade
The patients included in the study were classified as grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3. The Birmex® group had 2,262 (56%) grade 1; 1,685 (41.72%) grade 2; and 91 (2.25%) grade 3. The patients treated with Alacramyn® were 2,513 (46.62%) grade 1; 2,683 (49.78%) grade 2; and 194 (3.6%) grade 3. The classification of intoxication grade by age groups is found in Table 2. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) did not have a statistical significance p = 0.17.
Hospital Stay Time
Hospital time was 240.08 ± 69.74 min for the Birmex® group, with a minimum hospital stay of 120 minutes; for the Alacramyn® group, 131.73 ± 51.25 min, with a minimum of 45 minutes. The comparison of means had a statistical significance of p = 0.001.
Adverse Events
No user died, and no adverse effects or secondary reactions were reported while they were hospitalized.
Poisoning by scorpion sting is a public health problem requiring greater epidemiological surveillance in the places with the highest incidence. Due to the clinical condition it causes, it is necessary to train the personnel who attend these cases in the first line (paramedics, general practitioners, nurses) to provide better quality care and have better epidemiological knowledge.
The clinical practice guideline describes the number of vials to be administered according to the degree of poisoning by scorpion sting and the signs and symptoms that the patient present. However, in other publications it has been mentioned that the use of Birmex® and Alacramyn® as a treatment is different with respect to the number of vials administered, which is not mentioned or described in the clinical practice guidelines.
The dose and hospital time were considerably higher in the Birmex® group, which has a different impact on the use of both antidotes in scorpion sting poisoning.
Our study's limitations are the absence of indirect costs for a better estimate of the total cost of care for scorpion sting poisoning, not being a randomized study, and not having had both products during the entire data collection period.
Nevertheless, the information presented on the administered doses of both products and the hospital stay can be used to design future studies.
This study shows information from hospitalization for a scorpion sting, describes the intoxication grade, hospital stay, and used doses of the available products in the national market. All that has not been established with a sample number as described.
One difference observed was the use of vials required for the resolution of intoxication between the two mentioned antivenoms, which was favorable for Alacramyn®.
According to the results in the present study, the hospital time was shorter in the Alacramyn® group compared with Birmex®. Likewise, the cost per scorpion sting with the use of Alacramyn® was lower, having a direct economic impact on the hospitals that provide the care, the speeding up of the reversal of symptoms, and a hospital stay of the services of emergencies. During the study period, no adverse effects were reported.
We thank Napoleón Villanueva Martell and Luis Baldemar Orozco Solorio for the academic advice provided.
The authors declared they had no conflict of interest related to the present study.
The authors designed, executed, and financed this study.
| 1. | D´Suze G, Corzo-Burguete GA, Paniagua-Solis JF (editores). Emergencias por Animales Ponzoñosos en las Américas. México, DF: Innova, CONACYT; 2011. |
| 2. | Secretaría de Salud. Prevención, diagnóstico, tratamiento y referencia de la intoxicación por picadura de alacrán. Evidencias y recomendaciones. México; 2015. Disponible en URL: http://www.cenetec-difusion.com/CMGPC/SS-148-08/ER.pdf |
| 3. | Chippaux JP, Goyffon M. Epidemiology of scorpionism: A global appraisal. Acta Trop. 2008;107(2):71-9. |
| 4. | Santibáñez-López CE, Francke OF, Ureta C, Possani LD. Scorpions from Mexico: From species diversity to venom complexity. Toxins (Basel). 2015;8(1):2. |
| 5. | Ponce Saavedra J, Francke B OF. Clave para la identificación de especies de alacranes del género Centruroides Marx 1890 (Scorpiones: Buthidae) en el Centro Occidente de México. Biológicas. 2013;15(1):52-62. Disponible en URL: http://www.academia.edu/6530396/Claves_para_Centruroides |
| 6. | Secretaría de Salud. Dirección General de Epidemiología. Boletín Epidemiológico. Semana 52, 2010. Disponible en URL: https://www.gob.mx/salud/acciones-y-programas/historico-boletin-epidemiologico |
| 7. | Secretaría de Salud. Dirección General de Epidemiología. Boletín Epidemiológico. Semana 52, 2011. Disponible en URL: https://www.gob.mx/salud/acciones-y-programas/historico-boletin-epidemiologico |
| 8. | Secretaría de Salud. Dirección General de Epidemiología. Boletín Epidemiológico. Semana 52, 2012. Disponible en URL: https://www.gob.mx/salud/acciones-y-programas/historico-boletin-epidemiologico |
| 9. | Secretaría de Salud. Dirección General de Epidemiología. Boletín Epidemiológico. Semana 52, 2013. Disponible en URL: https://www.gob.mx/salud/acciones-y-programas/historico-boletin-epidemiologico |
| 10. | Secretaría de Salud. Dirección General de Epidemiología. Boletín Epidemiológico. Semana 53, 2014. Disponible en URL: https://www.gob.mx/salud/acciones-y-programas/historico-boletin-epidemiologico |
| 11. | Secretaría de Salud. Dirección General de Epidemiología. Boletín Epidemiológico. Semana 52, 2015. Disponible en URL: https://www.gob.mx/salud/acciones-y-programas/historico-boletin-epidemiologico |
| 12. | Secretaría de Salud. Dirección General de Epidemiología. Boletín Epidemiológico. Semana 50, 2016. Disponible en URL: https://www.gob.mx/salud/acciones-y-programas/historico-boletin-epidemiologico |
| 13. | Secretaría de Salud. Dirección General de Epidemiología. Boletín Epidemiológico. Semana 52, 2017. Disponible en URL: https://www.gob.mx/salud/acciones-y-programas/historico-boletin-epidemiologico |
| 14. | Secretaría de Salud. Dirección General de Epidemiología. Boletín Epidemiológico. Semana 50, 2018. Disponible en URL: https://www.gob.mx/salud/acciones-y-programas/historico-boletin-epidemiologico |
| 15. | Almaraz-Lira JS, Chávez-Haro AL. Relación de la temperatura máxima, temperatura mínima y pluviometría por regiones climáticas sobre la incidencia de picadura de alacrán en México, 2010-2018. Hosp Med Clin Manag. 2019; 12:157-64. Disponible en URL: http://www.hospitalmedicineandclinicalmanagement.com/files/hmcm_19_12_4_157-164.pdf |
| 16. | Laboratorios de Biológicos y Reactivos de México. Ficha técnica Faboterápico Polivalente antialacrán. Birmex, 2015. Disponible en URL: https://es.scribd.com/document/482020325/faboterapico-antialacran-pdf |
| 17. | Instituto Bioclon. Alacramyn. Faboterápico Polivalente antialacrán. Ficha técnica, Biodiagnósticos, 2015. Disponible en URL:http://www.biodiagnosticos.com/fichas-tecnicas/antidotos-y-faboterapicos/bioclon/ficha-tecnica-alacramyn.pdf |
| 18. | Possani-Postay LD. El estudio de los componentes del veneno de alacranes en el contexto de la biología molecular, la farmacología y la medicina. Biotecnología. 2007;177-88. Disponible en URL: https://redtox.org/blog/caso-clinico/estudio-componentes-veneno-alacranesen-contexto-biologia-molecular-farmacologiay |
| 19. | Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-033-SSA2-2011, Para la vigilancia, prevención y control de la intoxicación por picadura de alacran. Disponible en URL: http://www.hcg.udg.mx/PAGs/Sec_Transparencia/PDFs_Transparencia/II_E_NOM_27.pdf |
| 20. | Rodrigo C, Gnanathasan A. Management of scorpion envenoming: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):74. |
| 21. | Armstrong EP, Bakall M, Skrepnek GH, Boyer LV. Is scorpion antivenom cost-effective as marketed in the United States? Toxicon. 2013;76:394-8. |
| 22. | Chávez-Haro AL, Ortiz E. Scorpionism and dangerous species of Mexico. In: Gopalakrishnakone P, Possani L, F Schwartz E, Rodríguez de la Vega R (eds), Scorpion Venoms. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2015. p. 201-13. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-007-6404-0_23 |
| 23. | Palma-Aguirre JA. Farmacoeconomía. Un concepto nuevo de una práctica antigua. Gac Med Mex.1998;134(5):621-624. DIsponible en URL: https://www.anmm.org.mx/bgmm/1864_2007/1998-134-5-621-624.pdf |
| 24. | Granja-Bermúdez VM, Martínez-Zúñiga R, Chico-Aldama P. Tratamiento del alacranismo y costos. Alergia e Inmunol Pediatr. 1999;8(4):113-7. Disponible en URL: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/alergia/al-1999/al994d.pdf |
| 25. | Sánchez-Tejeda G, Barroso-ParedesM. Programa para la atención local, oportuna y eficaz de personas agredidas por picadura de alacrán por medio de personal comunitario capacitado en ocho localidades rurales de Amatlán de Cañas, Nayarit. [Tesis de Maestría]. México: INSP, 1996. |
| 26. | Lagunas-Flores A, Lagunas-Jaimes GN. Alacranismo en Guerrero, México. Tratamiento médico y remedios caseros. [Scorpion puncture: medical treatment and home remedies]. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2009;47(6):659-64. |
| 27. | Gobierno de México. IMSS. Compra Consolidada 2018-2019. Disponible en URL: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.imss.gob.mx/compraconsolidada |
| 28. | Gobierno de México. IMSS Documentación Compra Consolidada 2017-2018. Disponible en URL: http://www.imss.gob.mx/compraconsolidada/2017 |
| 29. | Gobierno de México. IMSS. Documentación Compra Consolidada 2016-2017. Disponible en URL: http://www.imss.gob.mx/compraconsolidada/2016 |
| 30. | CHEERS Checklist. Items to include when reporting economic evaluations of health interventions. Available from URL: https://www.equator-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Revised-CHEERS-Checklist-Oct13.pdf |